Search Results for: Estimating Reproducibility

Estimating The Reproducibility of Psychological Science in 2021

Uncategorized

Psychology is the science of human affect, behavior, and cognition. Since the beginning of psychological science, psychologists have debated fundamental questions about their science. Recently, these self-reflections of a science about itself have been called meta-science. Many meta-psychological discussions are theoretical. However, some meta-psychological articles rely on empirical data. For example, Cohen’s (1961) seminal investigation … Continue reading Estimating The Reproducibility of Psychological Science in 2021 →

Estimating Reproducibility of Psychology (No. 107): An Open Post-Publication Peer-Review

Uncategorized

Introduction In 2015, Science published the results of the first empirical attempt to estimate the reproducibility of psychology.   One key finding was that out of 97 attempts to reproduce a significant result, only 36% of attempts succeeded. This finding fueled debates about a replication crisis in psychology.  However, there have been few detailed examinations of individual … Continue reading Estimating Reproducibility of Psychology (No. 107): An Open Post-Publication Peer-Review →

Estimating Reproducibility of Psychology (No. 118): An Open Post-Publication Peer-Review

Uncategorized

Introduction In 2015, Science published the results of the first empirical attempt to estimate the reproducibility of psychology.   One key finding was that out of 97 attempts to reproduce a significant result, only 36% of attempts succeeded. This finding fueled debates about a replication crisis in psychology.  However, there have been few detailed examinations of individual … Continue reading Estimating Reproducibility of Psychology (No. 118): An Open Post-Publication Peer-Review →

Estimating the Replicability of Psychological Science

Estimating Reproducibility, Hand-Coding, Replicability, Z-Curve, Zcurve

Over the past years, psychologists have become increasingly concerned about the credibility of published results. The credibility crisis started in 2011, when Bem published incredible results that seemed to suggest that humans can foresee random future events. Bem’s article revealed fundamental flaws in the way psychologists conduct research. The main problem is that psychology journals … Continue reading Estimating the Replicability of Psychological Science →

Estimating Reproducibility of Psychology (No. 43): An open, post-publication review

Estimating Reproducibility, ,

Introduction In 2015, Science published the results of the first empirical attempt to estimate the reproducibility of psychology.   One key finding was that out of 97 attempts to reproduce a significant result, only 36% of attempts succeeded. This finding fueled debates about a replication crisis in psychology.  However, there have been few detailed examinations of … Continue reading Estimating Reproducibility of Psychology (No. 43): An open, post-publication review →

Estimating Reproducibility of Psychology (No. 52): An Open Post-Publication Peer-Review

Uncategorized

Introduction In 2015, Science published the results of the first empirical attempt to estimate the reproducibility of psychology.   One key finding was that out of 97 attempts to reproduce a significant result, only 36% of attempts succeeded. This finding fueled debates about a replication crisis in psychology.  However, there have been few detailed examinations of individual … Continue reading Estimating Reproducibility of Psychology (No. 52): An Open Post-Publication Peer-Review →

Estimating Reproducibility of Psychology (No. 111): An Open Post-Publication Peer-Review

Uncategorized

Introduction In 2015, Science published the results of the first empirical attempt to estimate the reproducibility of psychology.   One key finding was that out of 97 attempts to reproduce a significant result, only 36% of attempts succeeded. This finding fueled debates about a replication crisis in psychology.  However, there have been few detailed examinations of individual … Continue reading Estimating Reproducibility of Psychology (No. 111): An Open Post-Publication Peer-Review →

Estimating Reproducibility of Psychology (No. 136): An Open Post-Publication Peer-Review

Uncategorized

Introduction In 2015, Science published the results of the first empirical attempt to estimate the reproducibility of psychology.   One key finding was that out of 97 attempts to reproduce a significant result, only 36% of attempts succeeded. This finding fueled debates about a replication crisis in psychology.  However, there have been few detailed examinations of individual … Continue reading Estimating Reproducibility of Psychology (No. 136): An Open Post-Publication Peer-Review →

Estimating Reproducibility of Psychology (No. 124): An Open Post-Publication Peer-Review

Uncategorized

Introduction In 2015, Science published the results of the first empirical attempt to estimate the reproducibility of psychology.   One key finding was that out of 97 attempts to reproduce a significant result, only 36% of attempts succeeded. This finding fueled debates about a replication crisis in psychology.  However, there have been few detailed examinations of individual … Continue reading Estimating Reproducibility of Psychology (No. 124): An Open Post-Publication Peer-Review →

Estimating Reproducibility of Psychology (No. 61): An Open Post-Publication Peer-Review

Uncategorized

Introduction In 2015, Science published the results of the first empirical attempt to estimate the reproducibility of psychology.   One key finding was that out of 97 attempts to reproduce a significant result, only 36% of attempts succeeded. This finding fueled debates about a replication crisis in psychology.  However, there have been few detailed examinations of individual … Continue reading Estimating Reproducibility of Psychology (No. 61): An Open Post-Publication Peer-Review →