Replicability-Index

Improving the replicability of empirical research

Skip to content

About
2019 Blogs
2018 Blogs
2017 Blogs
2016 Blogs
Ioannidis is Wrong Most of the Time
The Validation Crisis in Psychology
A Quick Fix for the Replication Crisis in Psychology
Z-Curve.2.0
A Meta-Psychological Perspective on the Decade of Replication Failures in Social Psychology
Personalized P-Values for Social/Personality Psychologists
Replicability Rankings 2010-2020
Z-Curve: An even better p-curve
A Meta-Scientific Perspective on “Thinking: Fast and Slow

Search for:

The Test of Insufficient Variance (TIVA): A New Tool for the Detection of Questionable Research Practices

May 13, 2015UncategorizedUlrich Schimmack

Finally corrected and updated the Introduction to Test of Insufficient Variance showing bias in Bem (2011) and Vohs (2006).

Share this:

Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...

Post navigation

← Why Psychologists Should Not Change The Way They Analyze Their Data: The Devil is in the Default Prior A Critical Review of Cumming’s (2014) New Statistics: Reselling Old Statistics as New Statistics →

2 thoughts on “The Test of Insufficient Variance (TIVA): A New Tool for the Detection of Questionable Research Practices”

Pingback: A Comparison of Scientific Doping Tests | Replicability-Index
Pingback: Consider the source: Can you trust implicit social cognition researchers? | Replicability-Index

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Powered by WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: