Replicability-Index

Improving the replicability of empirical research

Skip to content

About
Z-Curve.2.0
Z-Curve Webinar
Princeton Talk About Z-Curve
Z-Curve: An even better p-curve
Z-Curve Citations
False Psychology Glossary
A Meta-Psychological Perspective on the Decade of Replication Failures in Social Psychology
2022 Replicability Rankings of Psychology Journals
Replicability Rankings of Psychology Departments
Estimating the False Discovery Risk of Psychology Science
Personalized P-Values for Social/Personality Psychologists
Personality Science: The Science of Human Diversity
A Meta-Scientific Perspective on “Thinking: Fast and Slow
Most published results in medical journals are not false

Search for:

The Test of Insufficient Variance (TIVA): A New Tool for the Detection of Questionable Research Practices

May 13, 2015UncategorizedUlrich Schimmack

Finally corrected and updated the Introduction to Test of Insufficient Variance showing bias in Bem (2011) and Vohs (2006).

Share this:

Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...

Post navigation

← Why Psychologists Should Not Change The Way They Analyze Their Data: The Devil is in the Default Prior A Critical Review of Cumming’s (2014) New Statistics: Reselling Old Statistics as New Statistics →

2 thoughts on “The Test of Insufficient Variance (TIVA): A New Tool for the Detection of Questionable Research Practices”

Pingback: A Comparison of Scientific Doping Tests | Replicability-Index
Pingback: Consider the source: Can you trust implicit social cognition researchers? | Replicability-Index

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Powered by WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: