Click on this link to see the latest rankings for over 100 Psychology Journals for 2015.
The replicability rankings below are based on post-hoc power analyses of published results. The method is explained in more detail elsewhere. More detailed results and time trends can be found by clicking on the hyperlink of a journal. The ranking for the average replicability score in 2010-2014 and 2015 is r = .66, indicating that there are reliable differences in replicability between journals. Movements by more than 10 percentage points are marked with an arrow.
Reblogged this on peakmemory and commented:
Given all the attention the Association for Psychological Science has given the issue of replication, it was surprising to see their flagship journal Psychological Science received a grade of D.